Local News
District Attorney asked for Department of Justice to investigate County Commissioner
In August of 2007 District Attorney Joshua Marquis wrote to Steve Briggs of the Department of Justice (DOJ) asking that Briggs’ Criminal Justice Division investigate and determine whether the actions of Richard Lee, then a county commissioner, constituted criminal misconduct.
In the letter Marquis stated he had resisted acting on continued reports that Lee was pressuring county employees to benefit his private financial endeavors because his wife ran against Lee and he thought an investigation by his office would be “inappropriate”. He goes on state that now that it had “escalated” to four employees of the county having a complaint against Lee he does not believe it is right “to simply ignore” the “continuing reports”.
The problem with the letter is that is that two of the four had been investigated and Marquis had complete access to the reports on the completed investigations and knew the allegations for what they were. The complainants admitted that they were not pressured to make rulings in Lee’s favor.
In the letter to the DOJ Marquis states that Sirpa Duoos stated her concerns to Sheriff Bergin. In NCO’s interview with Bergin, he says that Duoos’ stated her concerns to him and one week later recanted her story, saying that upon reflection it was just Lee’s nature and she wasn’t actually being pressured to do anything.
When Sirpa Duoos was contacted she was not pleased that her name had been used in a complaint to a government agency. At first she declined to comment. Duoos then decided to issue a statement after she was told that Sheriff Bergin said she had recanted her original concern that she had supposedly stated to him. Duoos wrote:
District Attorney Marquis’ August 10, 2007 letter to the Department of Justice claims that I expressed concerns to Sheriff Bergin about Richard Lee pressuring me for his own gain.
I never expressed any concerns to Sheriff Bergin that Richard Lee or his wife intimidated or pressured me in any way. I worked with the Lees in my capacity as a compliance officer for Clatsop County, and had a good working relationship with the Lees. If we disagreed on an issue it was professional, and I never felt threatened or intimidated. If the Lees had ever pressured or intimidated me, I would not report to Sheriff Bergin, but instead would follow the county government’s procedures to report these concerns.
In January of this year, I shared this information with attorney Jill Goldsmith, but was never interviewed by anyone with the Oregon Department of Justice.
Sirpa Duoos
In the Public Information Request (PIR) to the county NCO asked for all interviews that Goldsmith submitted to the county. County replied that all that Goldsmith had submitted to county had already been released in the Goldsmith Report. Duoos’ interview relating her working relationship with the Lees was not detailed in the Goldsmith Report.
In NCO’s original Public Information Request to the DOJ all information pertaining to Commissioner Richard Lee was asked for, with no restrictions relating to years. The Department of Justice also included several pages of hand written notes. None of the notes contained any mention of Sirpa Duoos being on the list to be interviewed.
District Attorney Marquis’ letter goes on to state, “… just most recently an employee of the Building and Grounds department who brought his concerns to a local gunsmith named Sky Olson.” Olson, himself, has been unable to give a comment to NCO because of an ongoing personal family issue. However, he did indicate that no county employee contacted him with concerns. Others who know the story said that while out canvassing for signatures for the 4-123 ballot measure petition, Olson was given a letter that a county employee was considering submitting to the Daily Astorian. Olson asked Marquis what to do with the letter and Marquis said he didn’t want anything to do with it. The location of the letter and the identity of the county employee is unknown, at this time.
According to the information released by the DOJ, neither an investigation nor an inquiry occurred between August 2007 and the end of that year. It was not until January 2008 that an inquiry was started, soon after county employee Jennifer Bunch made her complaint and Jill Goldsmith was hired to investigate it.
Based on Sheriff Bergin’s insistence that multiple investigations or inquiries have been conducted on Lee over the past two years by the Department of Justice NCO sent an additional Public Information Request to the state department again asking for all documents that the DOJ has regarding Richard Lee and asking for the disposition of any complaints on Richard Lee. The PIR was sent on April 11. In a letter dated April 17, 2008, the Department of Justice replied that they believed they had documents that NCO was requesting and would provide them, “within a reasonable length of time.” NCO still has not received these additional documents.
Local Media
Police Blotter
Articles Elsewhere
Recent Comments
On Nov 18, 5:48 PM, Patrick McGee …
By its all here, can't you read? from the article Rehearing of FERC's Bradwood order is granted for Limited Purpose.will be ready before 2025 to handle …
By Nick from the article Rehearing of FERC's Bradwood order is granted for Limited Purpose.I didn’t realize getting LNG from Alaska …
By Nick from the article Rehearing of FERC's Bradwood order is granted for Limited Purpose.lol, I was saying how sad the …
By senior citizen from the article Incumbents keep seats: Last 190 ballots result in no changes.Who says we need LNG Imports Nick? …
By Patrick McGee from the article Rehearing of FERC's Bradwood order is granted for Limited Purpose.The enviro movement is all about fundraising...these …
By Sick of bake sales... from the article Rehearing of FERC's Bradwood order is granted for Limited Purpose.I’ve visited CRK’s website as well as …
By Nick from the article Rehearing of FERC's Bradwood order is granted for Limited Purpose.Good article, Carrie. To Un-Hip Reader and …
By Bob Goldberg from the article Incumbents keep seats: Last 190 ballots result in no changes.
27 Comments
On May 9, 7:26 AM, Patrick McGee wrote:
So?
Your point Bartoldus?
On May 9, 8:19 AM, Avid Reader wrote:
Oh God. He’s b-a-a-a-ck.
On May 9, 8:43 AM, guest wrote:
Oh, you mean the out of towner transplant who thinks he’s got all the answers to make everything better for the locals. That goes for Pat and Josh.
By the way, the crowd didn’t chant “Farce”, Josh said that to Joe Gamm and Gamm elaborated and made it sound like it was that words of many. Great journalism, Gamm.
Carrie’s point is that Josh’s mission is to upset local politics through personal vendettas. Shouldn’t he be doing something else like maybe the job he was elected to do?
On May 9, 9:40 AM, new guest wrote:
Once again Carrie’s voice comes through loud and clear, thank you!
Also once again Marquis made a mountain out of a mole hole, ruining peoples lives, wasting money, time that is the point!
On May 9, 12:17 PM, Patrick McGee wrote:
And is it true that I hear that this same “Looney Toon” that presumes to call itself a writer for this socalled “Media outlet” now sits as co-chair of the current Clatsop County Budget Committee?
On May 9, 1:16 PM, Beach Boy wrote:
McGee, I’m sorry your back.
Josh, your mask is starting to come off, people are seeing you for what you are. You are dangerous to the good people of this community.
On the journalism of Gamm on the chant “FARCE” that was all Marquis to Gamm. Joe, why don’t you follow our D.A. out of this town.
On May 9, 1:47 PM, Luther Billis wrote:
Please! Just ignore McGee, he’s a pitch baby sock puppet not worthy a response.
On May 9, 3:12 PM, neignbors wrote:
Would anyone like it if the DA wanted you investigated by the DOJ, for doing NOTHING? You really aren’t very smart Mcgee, it shows everytime you open your mouth. The public is in need of a reporter who reports all sides. Your negative remarks are of no help to anyone!
For the benefit of the persecuted and not guilty shut your mouth.
On May 9, 5:17 PM, Jon Dana wrote:
On May 9, 6:26 AM, Patrick McGee wrote:
So?
Your point Bartoldus?
-----------------------------
On another board you ask for the letter from Marquis to DOJ, then you have this response? The more this site validates the truth the sillier you look.
On May 9, 6:00 PM, Bob wrote:
”And is it true that I hear” How would we know if its true that you hear? Most of the time you seem pretty deaf. Are you prone to listening to lies? Is what you are hearing that Cary Johnson is writing articles here and do you believe it?
You can always tell when Carrie’s hit it right on the nose, Cindy and Patrick attack her and not the article.
Cindy “Voter” Price is the expert on what bitterness is. She thought she was going to get the nod to go for District Three. Too bad, so sad. At least she got Sam to pout for her.
On May 9, 9:58 PM, Voter,too wrote:
Thank you, Carrie, for yet another revealing investigative report. It seems that our district attorney has blatantly misused his elected position just as he so adamantly and falsely accused another elected official of doing. And then to admit that he makes his decisions dependent on “political inconvenience” or convenience, is just about as low as one can get. Mr. Marquis and his followers have absolutely no moral or ethical bounds. It’s repulsive to know that some of my tax dollars are spent to help pay for this infection in our county.
On May 9, 10:12 PM, William O Douglas Fir wrote:
Marquis is a two bit lying little weasel who again has been caught abusing his office to meddle in local politics. Time for him to go.
On May 10, 8:07 AM, Beach Boy wrote:
I think a lot of people are now getting the picture. Good bye to the Marquis’s,Gamm’s,McGee’s, Rocca’s,and all of the “LOONIES” of the county. Oh, Don"t forget Forrester of the local rag we should all discontinue taking.
On May 10, 10:19 AM, Bleach Boy wrote:
The DA’s days are numbered. Both of them (Where have I heard that before?)
On May 10, 11:21 AM, brilliant wrote:
We don’t know. Is your ear located on your ass?
On May 12, 10:07 AM, citizen wrote:
Yes, how true when Carrie delivers the truth, Mcgee starts up spewing and causes problems. I guess trying to discredit her..but ends up looking like the fool.
On May 12, 12:25 PM, Halley's Comment wrote:
Oh, Don"t forget Forrester of the local rag we should all discontinue taking.
And to send a stronger message to Forester would be to boycott local businesses who advertise in the Daily Astorian. Also, encourage the same businesses to seek alternative advertising outlets. Best to hit the Daily Astorian where it would hurt the most. In the wallet.
On May 12, 12:38 PM, Name (required) wrote:
On May 9, 6:26 AM, Patrick McGee wrote:
So?
Your point Bartoldus?
Mcgee, have you recently been declared officially retarded or are you just hopelessly plain stupid?
The point is Marquis & Bergin lied their asses off. They’ve been caught and called on it.
On May 12, 9:21 PM, Beach Boy wrote:
The Marquis letter pretty much tells the tale. Marquis is using his office and staff to dictate what “HE” wants in the county. This is so wrong for the tax payers in this county. The sad part of this is we are paying him his stipend to conspire against any one who opposes him. I think he should be disbarred.
On May 13, 5:48 AM, Patrick McGee wrote:
“The point is Marquis & Bergin lied their asses off. They’ve been caught and called on it.”
What lies specifically?
On May 13, 7:02 AM, Jon Dana wrote:
Patrick is right, no specific lies. This time. Just seems ironic in a time where we would like open govt., things have to be so secert in the DA’s office. Why not hold a press conference and tell everbody whats going on, be open and honest. Why only Lori Johnson, is she the only one he can really trust now, or if DOJ calls back that is the only one they should speak to? He couldn’t be public about it, cause he knew there was no truth to it. Which DOJ confirmed. All Josh wanted was a headline to hurt, true or not. A DA trying to control local politics is a shame.
On May 13, 10:03 AM, visitor wrote:
Mcgee read above post! I hope you come out of your fog.
I second the remark” A DA should not try to control local politics” We the people get hurt.
On May 13, 11:00 AM, guest wrote:
You’d think that as smart as Josh thinks he is he wouldn’t get caught screwing the pooch as often as he does. Sadly what is uncovered is probably the tip of the iceberg in regards to his pooch screwing.
On May 13, 11:07 AM, Sea Pea wrote:
What lies is the District Attorney telling?
The whole third paragraph is a lie. Marquis reports it to the DOJ as if it were fact. It is frightening that our DA would take disjointed and uncorroborated gossip and present it as fact to the department of Justice. Marquis KNEW for fact that the first two instances had been investigated and were found groundless. He goes on, later in his letter, to say, “Some sort of investigation” had been conducted by county when he knows full well a full investigation was done. He lies with complete impunity.
Marquis also knew Olson never talked to the Building and Grounds dept employee and no one ever came to Olson. Olson got the letter when he was out collection signatures for the petition and Olson asked him what to do with the letter that was handed off to him and Marquis said he didn’t want anything to do with it he found it so incredulous. What would Lee have to do with pressuring a Building and Grounds person??? The letter wasn’t even used in the 4-123 campaign!
And the Sheriff blatantly lies to Marquis about Duoos? On his own? Where did Marquis and Bergin whip the Duoos story up? And how come they thought Duoos would back them up? That is the really frightening thing about that story. If the Department of Justice had acted on Marquis letter last August and come in with an investigation on Lee in time to influence the outcome of Marquis stipend at the polls in November what sort of pressure would have been used on Duoos to make her conform to the story they had concocted for the DOJ???
This, folks is what is truly disturbing about what Marquis and Bergin did here. Has Bergin been whispering anything in anyone’s ear lately? What about? For someone who isn’t a politician or a reporter and “only cares about the safety of the people” he seems to using his public office for a lot more than what he’s authorized to use if for.
On May 13, 1:39 PM, cousin wrote:
All the more reason to bring Marquis, Bergen words out in the limelight, lets hear what they have to say. Maybe the radio stations would interview them or a reporter.Marquis loves the media, except close to home.
On May 21, 2:09 PM, a senior wrote:
Mcgoo please answer to what sea pea posted, I’m curious to hear your take.
On May 21, 5:01 PM, Patrick McGee wrote:
On May 21, 1:09 PM, a senior wrote:
Mcgoo please answer to what sea pea posted, I’m curious to hear your take.
My take is this is simply more vitriole inspired drivel from Bartoldus trying to make drama out of a dead issue.
You?
DOJ said simply, there was indeed an inquiry at the request of Clatsop County authorities but, there was not enough information available at the time to take it to the next step, a formal DOJ invesitigation.
That’s it, nothing more, nothing less and this clown wants to attempt to make it more than it actually was.
There was no collusion, conspiracy, lies, etc. At worst a misuse of semantics that some writer wannabe thinks will become a breaking, huge story.