Business

Oregon Prisons In Rural Oregon

Tryan Hartill March 30, 2008
Prison

Oregon Business Magazine has an excellent article on the economics of prisons in Oregon. As most people know Oregon spends more on prisons than any other State. And with to Measures on the ballot in November, we may become even further in front…..

From the article:

The national studies cite a number of problems with using prisons to boost economies. First, prisons do not pay local taxes. Second, they rarely if ever purchase goods and services locally, and while they sometimes try to hire locally, they do not always succeed because of union requirements that promotions must be based on seniority. Third, prison employees tend not to live near their place of employment, preferring to settle in outlying areas and commute. For example, 62% of the employees from the Ontario prison don’t live in Oregon but next door in Idaho, where property taxes and home prices are lower.

Then there is the matter of prison labor. In 1994, the same year Oregon voters passed Measure 11, they also approved Measure 17, which requires inmates to work a 40-hour week. As a result, Oregon prisoners work inside and outside of their facilities, cleaning parks, sorting mail, printing business cards, building cabins and making telemarketing calls for private companies, including Timeline Industries and National Marketing Solutions.

In addition to those specific shortcomings, there is the broader notion of “opportunity costs,” the cost of pursuing one choice rather than another. The idea is that operating large prisons in small, remote towns requires so much accommodation that it crowds out other opportunities that might lead to clusters of related, competing businesses propelling each other to innovate and expand. In other words, there is nothing entrepreneurial about a prison economy.

6 Comments

On Mar 31, 1:08 PM, Vicky wrote:

Measure 11 is a bad law! How can Oregon feel good sending youths to prison for a mandatory sentence? If they are good and abide by all rules the inmates don’t get out early.
The law was meant to catch the bad bad guys, it’s like throwing a fishing net out going after the big one and keeping the incidential catch!

On Apr 5, 11:43 AM, RBiddlecome wrote:

My favorite prison
http://www.cnn.com/US/9907/27/tough.sheriff/

On Apr 7, 2:08 PM, sara wrote:

No prison is a favorite, many innocent people are in prisons!!

On Apr 7, 3:52 PM, RBiddlecome wrote:

They all think they are innocent, but I do not believe in moral relativism.
Secondly, there are reasons it is my favorite. It has a very low repeat offender rate for one.
Third, There are many more guilty people in prisons.

On Apr 7, 5:08 PM, a guest wrote:

Of course there are many more guilty people in prisons, but what about the innocent ones??
They (all) don’t think they are innocent!

On Apr 24, 8:03 AM, Yeoman Warder from the Tower wrote:

Roughly between 40% to 60% (in some cases it is 90%) of criminals have serious mental health issues. The gaols are being used a mental health holding facilities which they were never intended to be used for. The big question is what do you do with these people? Reopen the walled and celled “cuckoos nest”? How long do you keep these people in the can? A great deal of these people have no skills and will never have any skills or coping ability no matter how much “training” you shove their way.

Very few people end up in gaol without due cause. For those who think these people are innocent and helpless need a reality check. Granted there are those instances where people have been caught up in the judicial food chain for no fault of their own - but these are few and far between. You really have to work at to find yourself in the “sally port”

In the not too distant future there will be two ballot measures, no matter which one passes, there will be significantly increase in the gaol population. When you consider what Measure 11 did, and now the proposed “add ons”, we will need to build a number of very large and very expensive prisons. This is a big ticket item - a very big ticket item - which will compete with education and school funding.

Submit A Comment

Name (required)

Email (required, but not shown)

URL

Remember my personal information




Please enter the word you see in the image above:


North Coast Oregon

Business Links

Recent Comments

LWDUO Ordinance - SECTION 3.586 - Conditional Development and Use in OPR Zoned Properties; The following developments and their accessory developments may be permitted under a Type II procedure and … By Patrick McGee from the article What is the Biggest Issue Facing Clatsop County at this time?.

Absolutely NOT, Balkins.

CONDITIONAL USE is NOT outright permitting cables and pipelines. If it was OUTRIGHT they would remove the words, CONDITIONAL USE.

By marge from the article What is the Biggest Issue Facing Clatsop County at this time?.

I think all roads should be outlawed. We had over 40,000 deaths on roads last year. A hundred times more than lost in Iraq, 39988 more than lost world wide … By carmel from the article LNG Referendum 4-131 Campaign - Fraudulent or Fact?.

If this referendum has no impact on Bradwood why did I just recieve a piece of propaganda from them about the referendum encouraging me to vote yes?

Anyone, … By Native Califegon from the article LNG Referendum 4-131 Campaign - Fraudulent or Fact?.

Isn’t it so that every jewel has many facets. No one is as saint from where I sit.  But then I had an opportunity to see the sausage being made … By carmel from the article Clatsop County Manager Scott Derickson Headed To Woodburn.