You are viewing the archives of the old northcoastoregon.com. Please visit the new North Coast Oregon at: http://www.northcoastoregon.com/

Some Facts Behind Developer's Accusation Of Clatsop Co Planning Division

by Staff

Wednesday, February 12th, at their morning work session the Clatsop County Board of County Commissioners discussed the over 100 approved Measure 37 claims that were invalidated with the passage of Measure 49. At the end of the work session a letter from Jim Neikes was given to the BOCC from Commissioner Lee. Neikes is one of Lee’s constituents.

Based on the accusations made in the letter the NCO staff researched the open records available, Planning Division documentation, and interviewed as many of those involved as chose to talk about the issue. The following was ascertained:

An employee in the Planning Division, Building Codes Department, Jeffery Heinzman, got a development permit based on what another coworker described as a “fib”. Heinzman filed paperwork for the development his family was working on, stating it had access to water via the Burnside Water District. According to Burnside Water District they did not have water for the development at the time that the development permit was granted. Without a proven water source a development permit cannot be applied for, nor granted.

A partition was recorded, on a Measure 37 approved waiver for the Heinzmans, by the county clerk on November 19, 2007. According to the tentative agreement signed by Community Development Director Ed Wegner, the partition was to be signed by him before being considered completed and a development permit obtained. A record of that sign off has currently not been found. The only sign-off on the partition found was that of the surveyor. Major Partitions do not normally have to go through the Planning Commission .

According to Jennifer Bunch she has never worked on any Measure 37 claims. According to her records the Heinzmans’ measure 37 claim waiver was approved by Clatsop County on March 8, 2006 and by the State of Oregon on April 12, 2007. The only other thing she had to do with the Heinzman development was approving a road name and giving the new partition an address, both done after the partition was registered with the clerk.

According to the minutes of the Planning Commission a request for subdivision of Heinzman’s Measure 37 claim has never come before it. Since the area is a RA-2 the partition of a piece under two acres would not be permissible unless the subdivision has been approved as a Measure 37 waiver claim. One of the partitioned lots is under two acres. All permits issued to Heinzman after his registration of the survey with the county clerk read RA-1. Mike Weston, with the Planning Division, says this was an office mistake as zoning cannot be changed in an area whether or not a Measure 37 waiver has been approved for the property. Other Measure 37 waiver plat approvals have gone through the Planning Commission accompanied by a staff report.

On April 11, 2007 the Heinzmans first applied for a permit to develop their property. November 21, 2007, County Planner John Kanlund approved a development permit to the Heinzman property. On Dec 11, 2007, Kanlund wrote a letter to Heinzman stating that because water was not available to the partition all development must stop and no further permits would be issued. This is called “red flagging” a development so that others will know the development has issues that must be resolved before further permits can be issued. The project’s permit was approved November 21, 2007, withdrawn Dec 11, 2007. That 20 day period was the only time site development should have taken place. Extensive site develop has occurred, something which Neikes contends would have been noted had the normal Measure 37 waiver approval for a plat been observed.

Stewart Scarborough issued two permits, one mechanical and one plumbing to Jeff Heinzman on the partition on Dec. 28, 2007, seventeen days after the project was “red flagged”. Scarborough said he did not wish to make any statements on this issue.

Although no approved placement permits exist for the property a manufactured home sits on it. The property is leveled for a manufactured home and has a driveway; earthwork has been done. Heinzman applied for a manufactured home placement November 20, 2007, but has not yet received a permit. Because it is on a zoned geo-hazard overlay there are more stringent guidelines that must be followed before a home can be built or placed there. According to the Planning Division the home should not be there. Because there is not currently a code compliance specialist and the director is on vacation nothing can be done about the matter. Jim Neikes has argued that the Planning Division has known at least since January 8, 2007, about the manufactured home and should have known earlier if site inspections had been done as the home was bought in April 2007 and moved in June 2007 from Vince Campbell’s site in Lewis and Clark. According to the county Assessment Department the Manufactured Home is listed as still being on the Campbell site.

On December 14, 2007, all approved Measure 37 waivers were invalidated when Measure 49 took effect. At this time Clatsop County Board of County Commissioners is determining how best to help individuals with previously approved waivers (see related story ). One way is by determining a “vested” interest in which the claimant proves that they have put so much time, effort and expense into a development it would not be fair to stop them from finishing.

According to Planner Mike Weston in the Planning Division, no further work should be occurring nor permits being issued on the Heinzman development. The Heinzmans were contacted for their side of this issue. While first agreeing to talk to a reporter for NCO, one and half hours after the interview they left a message retracting everything they had said. They replaced it with the announcement that they didn’t wish to make a public statement. Weston said that because of budgetary constraints Jeffery Heinzman’s position was terminated January 15, 2007, and that Heinzman no longer works for the county.

Click stars to rate this article. This article hasn't been rated yet.

10 comments on this article (post your own)

1 On Feb 15, 07:16 am, Patrick McGee wrote:

“Most Likely”?

“Accusations”?

And once again “The Appearance” of trying to make a story out of nothing.

Best not forget Jennifer Bunch, a private citizen in the employe of Clatsop County, has some serious protections in her favor and trying to make her “The Goat” to Richard Lee’s benefit is “Most Likely” too little, too late.

2 On Feb 15, 08:20 am, THartill wrote:

Hey Patrick

You didn’t answer me on the $500 bet.

3 On Feb 15, 09:36 am, Patrick McGee wrote:

What was that bet again Tryan?

4 On Feb 15, 11:39 am, THartill wrote:

I’m sure you can find it Patrick…I trust your search skills.

But what to the Accusations have to do with the facts of this?

Sure we took them and investigated a little further and some were true and some of them were false. We even gave JB a chance to address her accuser, which she did. If you want to investigate this yourself I can give you all the documents and the names of the 10 or so people we interviewed.

Your smear tactics above are not doing much, but proving this whole story wrong would be very damaging to the intergity of this website.

5 On Feb 15, 12:28 pm, Ted M wrote:

A story out of nothing?

Lets see. A new county employee pushes his family’s development through even though he knows he doesn’t have the most important condition, water. He puts a trailer on the property without any proper permits, which technically voids all permits since the ordinances say that he must be in compliance with the ordinances before being given a permit. He’s able to do this right in front of a group of experienced professionals? Any of the rest of us would have to prove we met conditions, looks like they took his word for it. He’s got a house sitting on a site that shouldn’t be there. This is zoned GHO? You wouldn’t believe what this department puts people through who are zoned GHO, but this guy hasn’t had to do any of it? Permits that have zone changes on them? Who the hell did that? That really shows either incompetence or cover up. You don’t just change a zone! You have Scarborough clamming up here when he’s been caught playing favorites right after he claims Lee’s the only one getting away with this stuff? You’ve got a group of people that will possibly be the ones doing staff reports on who has vested rights in getting developments from their Measure 37 claims finished, already showing either favoritism or glaring incompetence to allow so many illegal things to happen right under their noses. Seeing how they were able to jump all over Lee’s four outstanding “problems” on his development, its sort of funny they couldn’t see all of the problems with a Measure 37 claim, although everyone else’s measure 37 claim gets close scrutiny.

I think that makes it a story. It shouldn’t be the end of the story. I’d either like to know if this case is getting turned over to a code compliance officer or how I can get such a sweet deal.

As far as Bunch goes McGee, if she’s got such serious protections whats she need an old codger like you defending her?

O yeah, don’t ya think Wegner might be a little over extended? He’s director of how many departments/divisions and now they might be having him be deciding vested rights? If he doesn’t have the time he’s going to rely heavily on staff reports. This staff? I think county needs to hire a few more division directors.

6 On Feb 15, 12:38 pm, Patrick McGee wrote:

Tryan I think NCO is building the path of its future and integrity all on its own and most certainly my help is completely unnecessary and I am simply asking questions and making observations.

You certainly don’t have to justify your…....reporting to me or anybody else.

Now, “Smear Tactics”?

Hardly.

7 On Feb 17, 10:33 pm, Country Boy wrote:

Patrick McGee

That is all you do is try distroy someone or something. Why don’t you try building someone up and make youself feel good?

I am sorry you are Ill

8 On Feb 18, 10:15 am, Patrick McGee wrote:

Conutry Boy Said:Patrick McGee

That is all you do is try distroy someone or something. Why don’t you try building someone up and make youself feel good?

I am sorry you are Ill

I’m just one person with one voice, as you are.
I have no power to destroy anybody, just my name for you to target and it’s out of a sense of accountability for my actions that you can do so and, finally, we all have our little quirks….don’t we?

9 On Feb 19, 06:00 pm, Your Conscience wrote:

Sorry Mr. McGee your living proof that attaching one’s name to a post makes you accountable to no one, not even yourself.

10 On Feb 20, 07:42 am, Patrick McGee wrote:

Sorry Mr. McGee your living proof that attaching one’s name to a post makes you accountable to no one, not even yourself.

Especially, it seems, on this site and don’t be sorry, it comes with the territory….”What ye sow, so shall ye reap”

Post A Comment

(required)

(required but not displayed)



(No HTML, Textile only please. Live comment preview below.)

this is not Spam.

preview

:

Aug 28, 03:43 pm


Previous Article:
« Focus on 49: BOCC work session grapples with difficult legislature

Next Article:
On that Redacted Lee Memo on Grass Roots People »



NCO Reader Comments


Trey Burke (CCFOG - First report on Lee recall petition signatures)
Earnest Lawson (notes from Clean Slate PAC meeting 2/13/07)
Ron Valdez (Race for 100mpg Car has $10 Million Dollar Prize)
Jodi Greer (A gun show ... without guns ?)
Stuart Frost (Housing Credit Crunch: Who to Blame?)
Lionel Haley (After Storm Pics)
Fannie Bentley (Clatsop Justice...Why so many cases?)
Sal Page (Measure 50....Healthy Kids...Cigarette Taxes)
Lucretia Ballard (More D.A. Talk)
Gertrude Guzman (Fast Food Customers Suspected in Sacagawea Heist)
John Weeks (Seaside Resident Josh Lampien Dies in Wreck)
Tamera Gibson (November 2007 Election Results...31 Votes..Holy Smokes!!)
Christa Nichols (We Don't Need FEMA Money)
Rhoda Terry (On the Jill Goldsmith Report)
Glenn Webster (Jennifer Bunch Letter Re: Richard Lee - Get it here First)
Guy Munoz (Coming to a phone near you)
Norbert Nelson (What does the Federal Government Do with our Taxes?)
Jackson Roberson (Fort George Brewery Coming Alive)
Starla Lawson (Richard Lee Recall Swings into motion)
Tammie Wade (Other News from Astoria City Council)

Recent Articles

View All Articles...

Feeds



Home | Archives | Contribute | Back to Top
Take What You Want 2008 NorthCoastOregon.com unless otherwise indicated.
Please email us with any questions or comments.
Site created by Upspring Design.